'Session Long Project: Working on a Negative Letter\r'

'Dear Ms. Ambrose,\r\nThank you for allowing me to show your case.  I went over your points, which you gave in the fifth daytime of whitethorn 2008.  I saw that you atomic number 18 16 geezerhood old, a graduate of high domesticate through tests conducted by the General Education culture (G.E.D.) in February 6, 2007, and has earned 15 semester college hours at the in the alto stick toher Jersey City University on the first semester of S.Y. 2007-2008.  It is in like manner indicated here, in the files that you submitted on May 5, that you scored a secure 71 on your Armed Services vocational Aptitude Battery (ASVAB) test, which should earn you the right to image the U.S. Navy here and then, especially that you are closely to turn 17 years old this approach shot month.\r\nWhen I took your case to the office on the eighth day of this month, the numbers show that, for the enlistment of 2007-2008, G.E.D. graduates bedevil filled up the 5% allowable appli assholets altogether this past week or specifically in April 30, 2008.  You have filed your request of application in the 5th of May 2008, but you will still get the chance to file again, since we are always control surface to appli sackts who are willing to join and launch an sweet career.  We should wait, however, for the next set of enlistments, which should be offered by expansive 2008.  By then, you should have turned 17 years old, with no indicate for not being trustworthy in the navy.\r\nIf you want, I can send other(prenominal) application to you once the door is open again for enlistment applicators.  That will only take well-nigh 2-3 months from now, which is only a little time, as compared to the wide opportunities that you will be having for the following years ahead.  I am sure that you will have no problems by then, especially if you earn more semester college hours, which you can still take in these three months that you have.  For the meantime, it wo uld be best to wait for the next destiny, which should arrive this August.  This can be an opportunity to get better standing, which should hypothecate well in your upcoming files.\r\nGood luck and see you again this August.\r\nSincerely,\r\n_________________\r\nSH1 (SW/AW) Jermaine Moore\r\nUnited States Navy Recruiter\r\nNRS Bossier City, lanthanum\r\nThe principles\r\nThe principles that were used in creating the garner above are mostly from the article of Joel Bowman (2002) of Western bread University.  I tried to be as tenacious and believable as I can be, without acquire too formal, so that the reviewer will sprightliness the concern of the earn generator (although not actually emotional).  I tried to indicate that what I was relaying to her was vigour very tragic or sad because another set of enlistments should arrive by the following 2-3 months.\r\nThe letter mirrored that what was happening was for the best of both the writer and the readerâ€a win-to -win situationâ€and even if the applicant’s request for admission has been denied, there are other opportunities in the future, which the writer would be blissful to accompany the reader.  I tried to show that the type was reasonable and legitimate, with the intention of offering the reader somewhat alternatives that might help in her getting judge in the next opportunity.\r\nThis is to compensate for the shortcoming, which makes the letter ripe (instead of backward-looking), motivational, and not very negative to read.  It makes the reader envision that the letter does not really indicate refusal or rejection but more of a delayed opportunity.  I tried to minimize the impact by hard to point out that the opportunity is not illogical but would come again in the months ahead.\r\nThe split\r\nFollowing the lecture of Bowman (2002), the letter that was presented is comprise of the following: (1) The ‘pace’ luck that, in this letter, dictates t he thankfulness of the writer for allowing him to examine the case, as well as the information that the writer has received concerning the case.  (2) The ‘lead’ portion that dictates the major episode that has led the writer to micturate a letter for the reader, which should include the negative subject that is the reason for filing the negative letter.  In this letter, it reflects that G.E.D. applicants were evaluate only until April 30, 2008.  (3)\r\nThe ‘blend outcomes’ portion that changes the angle of the letter from negative to positive; it turns the message from backward-looking to forward-looking.  In this letter, this fragment says that the reader will get the chance to file again by August of the same year.  Finally, (4) the ‘spark off’ portion, which dictates why the alternative would suit and benefit the reader, with the purpose to offer support and promote goodwill; this presents the reason on why the letter is not just negative, as it presents more positive opportunities that offer the reader some benefits.\r\nReferences\r\nBowman, J. (2002). Writing negative messages. Business discourse: managing information and relationships. Retrieved May 8, 2008, from Joel P. Bowman Homepage: http://homepages.wmich.edu/~bowman/badnews.html.\r\nCarroll, A. (2004). letter… we get stacks of letters and business notes. Retrieved May 8, 2008, from Dr. Jay’s Write Homepage: http://www.csun.edu/~vcecn006/lettr.html.\r\nSittenfeld, C. (1999, March). Good ways to riposte bad news. Fast Company Magazine, 23. Retrieved May 8, 2008, from FastCompany.com database: http://www.fastcompany.com/ time/23/buckman.html.\r\n \r\n \r\n \r\n'