Hamlet Literary Analysis Essay -- essays research papers

In & antiophthalmic f take onor8220 critical point, the cataclysm by William Shakespeare, settlement, the prince of Denmark withholds a great internal conflict throughout the play. As a result, hamlet contradicts himself many times throughout out the play, which caused the unneeded death of many others. As well as trying to be true to himself, crossroads is an expert at acting out roles and devising people falsely believe him. The roles he plays are ones in which he fakes madness to accomplish his goals. While one second Hamlet pretends to be under a strange spell of madness, seconds later he whitethorn become perfectly calm. He struggles with the issue of avenging his father&8217s death. He vows to kill Claudius exactly then backs out several times. Hamlet&8217s actions throughout the play support this deceitful nature. His double personalities are the foundation of his madness. There are many examples that illustrate how Hamlet&8217s deceitful nature results in a c ataclysm because of his inability to choose which role to play.      In Act One, Hamlet appears to be very straightforward in his actions and his role. When his mother questions him, Hamlet says, "Seems, madam? nay it is. I get along not seems" (1.2.76). By saying this, Hamlet lets Gertrude k this instant that he is what she sees, torn over his father&8217s death. Later, he makes a clear statement about his state of mind when he commits himself to revenge. "I&8217ll wipe away completely trivial doting records, all saws of books, all forms, all pressures past, that youth and observation copied there, and thy commandment all alone shall live within the book and volume of my brain" (1.5.100-104). In that statement, Hamlet is declaring that he will be committed to nothing else but the revenge of his fathers death. There is no confusion about Hamlet&8217s character in Act One. He has said sooner that he is what he appears to be, and there is no reason to doubt it.      In the side by side(p) act, Hamlet&8217s intentions suddenly become confusing. In the first act, Hamlet was dedicated and inspired in seeking revenge. However, when Hamlet appears again in the second act, he loses the conviction that was present earlier. He has yet to take up the orders assigned to him by the ghost. He spends the act walking around, reading, and talking with Polonius, Rosencrantz, Guildenst... ...ave love her, but he did not. Had he loved her he would not make treated her so poorly earlier. He is now committed to acting, and loving Ophelia fits the role. In the rest of the play Hamlet sticks to his resolve. He barely has time to tell his story of escape to Horatio before he is challenged. He does not refuse the challenge because as nobility, he cannot refuse he has to keep his honor. Hamlet goes to the match and because he has now accepted the role, he does not hesitate to kill the King when prompted to do so.      Throughout the whole play, Hamlet wrestles with an internal conflict that ultimately be not only Claudius&8217 life, but also many others, including his own. He even feels that playing one role can transform his inner feelings as well. While one moment Hamlet is committed to revenge, the next moment he is not sure if Claudius was the killer. In one sight Hamlet praises acting and realizes his role, but in the next he decides to stray off his deeds. If Hamlet had followed through with his actions, and had not debated so often, there would have been fewer deaths. Hamlet&8217s inability to act carry on to everyone&8217s demise.