'A Comparison of Moral Views Essay\r'

'When we count of past philosophies, we immediately think of the early Greek philosophers. Among them were Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle, considered as the Fathers of Philosophy. Although they have different views on some certain aspects, we all whop that they are the nigh influential thinkers non only during their respective quantifys notwithstanding today. This paper give focus on the similarities and differences of the moral and respectable views of Socrates, Plato, and Aristotle.\r\nSocrates believed that self- familiarity will ensure the conditions of having a good spiritedness. For Socrates, knowledge and virtuousness are of the same category. If a somebody could not divulge knowledge, he cannot learn virtue. With this, he argued that virtue can be taught. â€Å"The unexamined life is not worth living.” Socrates believed that the chase of knowledge and wisdom should always capture first before any surreptitious interests. For him, seeking knowledge is in symmetry to ethical and moral actions.\r\nSocrates, considered to be the superlative philosopher of all sentence, assumed that reason will lead to the good life. He believed that the very mirth a mortal achieved was influenced in the first place by doing what seems to be right. When a somebody’s true value and survive is found, he will achieve triumph. The Socratic ethical motive can be categorised as teleological in disposition. We gentleman act towards the good and these actions naturally have their purposes.\r\nPlato, bid all the early philosophers, establish his beliefs on ethics on virtues and world well-being. Plato’s beliefs on happiness diverged importantly from other philosopher’s views. Due to this, his time on describing his own concept of happiness was divided. He spent lots of time criticizing the customary beliefs of the good life. Plato also considered happiness as perfect and is not slow understandable since it is supported by metaphysical assumptions that appear to be vague and is unrealistic to be understood. The focuses on Platonic ethics are the problems and difficulties of an soulfulness, not happiness as a factor of good-living.\r\nFor Aristotle, ethical knowledge is considered to be a general knowledge and not a precise knowledge. He argued that ethical knowledge is not a theoretical discipline but preferably practical in nature. Aristotle believed that to become good, a person should have experienced the actions of life and is in accordance to fine habits.\r\nHe did not believe that and examine virtues will make a token individual virtuous. One should do sinless and honorable to be good and virtuous. Aristotle believed that study and respect only would give a person his happiness. He argued that an individual finds happiness by fulfilling his work ons as a gentlemans gentleman being. For Aristotle, a human’s function is to utilize what he has that everything else does not, his cap acity to think or reason, or logos. A person using his ability to reason fulfills his nature as a rational understanding and therefore finds his absolute happiness.\r\nFor me, Aristotle’s ethical philosophy is the most applicable and the most practical to adapt. Unlike Socrates’ belief that an individual will be virtuous if he studies the virtues, Aristotle believed that one should act good to be good †not by merely studying how to be good nor what is good. Plato, on the other hand, focused on what should not be done in beau monde to make a person’s life good. Aristotle argued that understanding what is good does not make a person good. So I think, Aristotle’s concept on morality stands among the three of them, just like the saying goes â€Å"Actions speak louder than words.”\r\n'